The Liberal Utopia

Generally, we have a problem with the liberal utopia and the broken border anarchist, the subversive product of exile and misfortune and the ignominious integration (of the unscrupulous dogmas). This produced the fundamentalist but also the cultural decline that will wash away every semblance of western culture. Compelled by the logic of pain progressives today are more mistaken than ever, they get cultural diversity wrong and the concept of equality and tolerance wrong, and it is hard to pinpoint the bigot and the sinner in the high-risk environment they’ve created where everybody needs to be corrected or reformed. Of all the conflicts though, it seems that the idiosyncratic conflict is the prevalent one, that in the context of the global doctrines we find communion in produces the crisis of conscience; the ethnic and religious scourge that has plagued the world. There are ghettos forming in London and Paris and in other places like Barcelona where they don’t even want to speak the language anymore.

 

Today more than ever we must hold on to the known quantity especially as the options become more speculative. The known quantity that while increasingly distorted has been vilified and becomes protectionism, tribalism, xenophobia, racism, and other currencies we once knew as traditions, culture, countries, and nations. As the superlative axis is displaced by the “end of days globalist” things take on a different relative value and what used to be on the left is on the right and vice versa. We can see that they still have some of the same attributes but now relate differently to the environment, expressing a resistance to the alienating pressures of the deterministic market that always resumes to “a right” (or integrates into a tradition).

 

From the beginning it was easy to commoditize progressive’s “higher calling” as part of the low coefficient utopia and irrational determinism. As part of the Immaculate Conception they misallocate the source of moral values which seem to be absent or at best diluted in some subhuman notion where cultural idiosyncrasies become the diversity orthodoxy, along with a whole new list of virtues and sins. Don’t get me wrong I don’t like the fundamentalist or the fire breathing legal eagle that started the fire, but I know who they are. The self-righteous Hollywood hypocrite putting out the poison with one hand and pointing the finger with the other, that’s a dangerous one. The one crossing the border to ask for reforms, the one giving my daughter a condom in school, or selling marijuana, the one claiming the apocalyptic rights and flipping the script one affront at a time, one superhero at a time, one wink from Lucifer at a time, with every role reversal and every new leading man, insulting my intelligence with a concocted recipe of trans-idiosyncratic revisions and pieces of love on a shrine, as it all fades out to nothing.  

 

The right integration doesn’t take place and we keep adding with the fratricidal rights to the tensions, and just like the financial markets the deficit compounds and the hole gets bigger, and we walk ourselves into the same intractable situation where we need another even more repressive generalization to make ends meet, a higher price in a smaller time window. The one that only brings the price down if we sell a thousand times more, the price of the viral proliferation that never lets you go back completely, the generalization without the simplification. Other things contribute to the enrichment, huge highways leading to the axis of economic power that disassembled the small towns and cities, the small business owner and the day-to-day activity of normal society. The suburban phenomenon that started in the fifties encouraged by the speed of the automobile generating a dependency on structures that won’t keep up and the expectation we then attribute to social “minimum wage” and a distorted sense of justice and equality.

 

The financial system in spite of having become part of our cultures also evolved from the same divinity of doubt capable of eviscerating its own institutions. As a tradition it can make the price prohibitive but as the orthodoxy of pain and penance necessary and even inevitable. And that’s the predicament on every level, the one that drives up the prices and implies that we understand it and curb the demand. The economic imperialist would have us find refuge in globalization while holding on to the known quantity becomes increasingly difficult.

 

Capitalists argue that the capitalist system is based on actual demand while in the socialist system demand is determined by a bureaucratic government which often gets it wrong.  In the capitalist system, the argument is that people have the power to buy the products, or not, so they would have the final saying in the success or failure of any given company. The truth is that we could say capitalism is the manifest destiny of the currency which soon starts generating its own demand, and that’s why is so difficult to define. The argument only refers to one demand but does not say anything about the other demand, the alienating (nominal) count that eventually takes over. The amount of money you need to make ends meet which is an actual number.

 

The basic foundation of the system, which is that supply and demand will drive prices down and stabilize the market is not necessarily true. The interaction between the supply and demand of money tends to drive prices up and overwhelms the actual supply and demand they seem to refer to, which expresses the tendency to reduce the prices of the products very extemporaneously. A very expensive plasma TV becomes popular and a lot less expensive within a couple of years, then the price starts going up with inflation.

In reality money creates its own demand and products we don’t really need but want, the best example would be the automobile but since they have become so pervasive we’ll look for more obvious things like luxury resorts, million-dollar yachts, and the big mansions. How do you justify these products with the supply and demand argument?  We could mention other products associated with the fashion and entertainment industries or the gas-consuming pickup trucks we drive for sports in the cities, and many more. The argument is true for a moment until money gets traction generating a volume and the addiction, the excesses and speculation. A good example of this cognitive entanglement would be the pharmaceutical industry dogged determination to turn Americans into addicts and over commercialization of drugs.

 

These diverging values can be seen everywhere. An apartment for lease in an upscale neighborhood for ten thousand dollars can imply a whole host of things associated with your social status and the culture itself. The amount is abstract but it can express some real value which is where we get tangled up. It can reflect your educational level and the nature of your employment for instance, but it can also express the degree of decadence and social conditions unique to your environment. Principles reflected in the system of laws and other priorities.