Open Letter - Millennial Move

I have come under attack by an Alien entity that claims to be killing members of my family, apparently, we are being exterminated as we speak. It is a painful experience that should not go untold. They have even showed up in large numbers and made their presence known in no uncertain terms. I have tried to report this to the authorities and captured some of my impressions on several platforms like Facebook pages, YouTube channels and these Blogs.

Apparently, they’ve been using me in some kind of extortion associated with people in the darkest corners of our government and an ancient secret cabal running the world, organizations like the Illuminati that have been doing Satan’s bidding for their own advancement. In other words, it is intended to keep the code of silence imposed on humanity since ancient times. Through a system of terror and fear they keep strict control on human activity, politics and information in general.  

I have been held hostage in a very high stakes game that includes many of the accidents and “natural disasters” reported in the news lately. It seems to be making a basic demand that we submit to an advance that has until now depended heavily on confusion and our own ignorance. They are suspects already in the 911 attacks and the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, as well as the Challenger and Columbia “accidents” and the disappearance of Malaysia Air Lines 370.

I found out that they have been following most of my life and that I was taken from Cuba as a teenager to play this role in their perverse plan. My family has been made complete slaves and will do almost anything to avoid the worst effects of the assault. The radiation is almost constant along with a chanting that seems to prophase my awful fate. So far, I have suffered many injuries including several contusions as well as unexplained illnesses and many health problems. But it goes beyond that, they have conceived the complete destruction of human civilization and have been working diligently to bring about the prophetic end, coercing leaders in the institutions you should trust into lying to you, using death and the treat of harm to their families.

Unfortunately it's not just cattle and animals being mutilated, human mutilation is happening on all levels. News that could solve most conflicts going back thousands of years could not be ignored either, from the secrets of Machu Picchu and the Pyramids of Egypt to the Twin Towers' mystery. We are already the victims of a moral and economic assault that involves the penetration of all means communications, subverting popular culture and a systematic dismantling of our social institutions. In this context we get the invasion of immigrants and the commoditization "the oppressed" as well as the African American diaspora, which seems to have some inherent value after four hundred years of abuse and neglect. 

After handicapping the right and mutilating the left the favor mostly the liberal rising. If you think your sitcoms are increasingly about alternative families, same sex families, or no family at all, you are right. If you think television has been taken over by a radical progressive agenda full of transcultural revisions and decadent shows you are absolutely right. Today there is a concerted effort to flip the script on American and switch the lights off, financing the roll with the Fascist and the NRA along with the sins of racism and xenophobia. Diversity is our strength, but these concepts have been weaponized to undermine our survival. Today they lean on the right and favor mostly the liberal rising in what I call the move of the century, or should I say double move. And just like they’ve done before to other civilizations flip the house collecting the dividends of hundreds of years of abuse of millions of people, bringing about the apocalyptic end in a cynical bait and switch game that takes advantage of our best intentions.

This is why we are watching Operation Finale and the Black Klansman at the same time to remind us of another time, as well as God Friended Me and other revisions like the show Hamilton and Black Spiderman, as opposed to original stories. The Skin has been commoditized as well as technology and some other human trades such as morality and sexuality as part of the emotional harvesting and transhumanist approach, the ethnic and religious scourge afflicting the world. Some of the other movies that make reference to this event are Divergent, The Green Mile, The Maze Runner and Fury Road just to name a few. 

The suffocating embrace that afflicts us all is the result of the scourge earth approach and being caught in the spider web and wrapped in its silk. The last phase of the Millennial attack started with the Twin Tower attacks as part of a massive effort to bring down The United States that includes bringing down the cultural icons and historical landmarks. Promoting progressive woke ideas as part of a massive propaganda campaign against conservative values. All of it against the backdrop of the Deepwater Horizon disaster and Oil Spill, the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines MH-370, the crash of Germanwings flight 9525, The Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant disaster following the tsunami of 2011, and many of the recent wild fires across the American West.

As part of the plan to erase all my memories and completely emasculate me they have not only disfigured many parts of my body but have admitted to claiming the lives of many family members, including my mother and father. These are some of their name, Daisy Cruz Fernandez, Omar Fernandez, Emilio Fernandez, Jesus E. Garcia Ortiz, Nelson H. Ortiz, Jorge Luis Ortiz, Armando Ortiz, Manuel Alvarez Reyes, Miguel Juelle, Jesus Garcia Bencomo, Axel Dorado, James Guirado, Erick Olivare, Maite Campaniony, Barbarita, Rebeca, Graciela, Emilio and Yamila. There are also many more people caught in the crossfire.

New World Order - The Red Menace

The New World Order refers to a powerful elite that is conspiring to rule the world through an authoritarian government that would replace sovereign nations. An all-encompassing cabal which purpose is the establishment of a new world order as the natural progression of history. It involves many influential figures who operate through front organizations and orchestrate significant political and economic events, manipulating trade, public opinion and international conflicts in an ongoing efforts to achieve global domination. The New World Order has traditionally been associated with International Financiers, Zionist and secret societies like Illuminati, Freemasons, the Committee of 300 and Bilderberg Group.

 

After World War II the conspiratorial groups allegedly seized the opportunity to implement the agenda of globalization as a collective effort to address problems that were beyond the capacity of individual nations. The initiative led to the formation of international organizations such as the UN in 1945 and NATO in 1949 and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GATT in 1947 which regulated cooperation in order to achieve a peaceful transition into the new liberal order. These organization were generally opposed by American conservatives and economic nationalists. Progressives on the other hand welcomed these new international organization although they sustained that the regime lacked the means to achieve real global justice and equality. Activists form around the world formed a federalist movement hoping to create a real world government but never had any success.

 

Between 1947 and 1957 the threat of a bureaucratic world government known as the “Red Menace” became the focal point of apocalyptic conspiracy. But by 1960 many on the right were promoting the idea that the governments of the United States and the Soviet Union were both controlled by a group of Bankers and corporate internationalists who intended to use these international organizations as a vehicle to bring about the world government, which fueled a campaign for the United State to withdraw from the United Nations. After the fall of communism in 1989 the Red Menace shifted to a new form of liberal collectivism and supranationalism as the main proponents of a New World Order. Contributing to the shift was a right-wing opposition to corporate internationalism, as the left embraces the globalization process true to the historical paradigm and attempts to disproof the right,  defining the new frontlines between globalist and conservatives, international financiers and industrialist nationalists.

 

In 1966 Mary M. Davison published The Profound Revolution, a manifesto of sorts suggesting that the New World Order hides in plain sight and describing how real-life institutions like the Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the U.S. government operate as fronts for the “international banker” shadow Establishment.  Conservative commentator Gary Allen publishes None Dare Call It Conspiracy in 1972 in which he explains the paranoia in the context of deficit spending and basic banking, offering also tales of how the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission carry forth the economic agenda of an invisible global power.

 

The Birch Society true to its natural instincts and anticommunist stand saw the menace of an autocratic world government in the Civil Rights movement. Their objection is becomes obvious in an advertisement in the October 31, 1965 issue of the Palm Beach Post titled, “The John Birch Society Asks: What’s Wrong With Civil Rights?” The half-page advertisement begins with the statement that nothing is wrong with civil rights, just with the Civil Rights Movement.  According to the JBS, it constituted a communist plot to build a Black Soviet Republic in the United States. They also express the opinion that black people were being manipulate and the Civil Rights Movement was inspired by anticolonialism sentiments in Africa and Asia, although “they enjoyed a far better quality of life than ninety percent of people in the world”.   

During the late 1950s and 1960s the world was convulsing with wars of liberation between colonial white regimes and Asian and African nationalist insurgents especially. Kenya and Algeria experienced uprisings that led to the regimes the British and French regimes to grant their independence in the early 1960s. Fascist Portugal fought African nationalist insurgencies in Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea-Bissau, during the 1960s and early 1970s which led to a military coup in Lisbon in 1974 and a sudden withdrawal from Africa. In white settler ruled Southern Rhodesia (today’s Zimbabwe), South African occupied South West Africa (today’s Namibia), and apartheid South Africa, African nationalists became frustrated with increasingly deadly state repression and abandoned non-violent protest in the 1960s to embark on armed struggles to liberate their countries. Given the Cold War context of the time, the colonial states portrayed themselves as champions of Western civilization and appealed to Britain and the United States for assistance and the African nationalists received support from the Eastern Bloc which required them to adopt the socialist rhetoric. Newly independent countries, such as Tanzania and Zambia, were often sympathetic to the armed nationalist movements and allowed them to establish staging areas in their territories which meant that these states were often drawn into the conflicts as well.

When president John F Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963, it shook a country that was already concerned with the Cold War and the threat of a nuclear war as well as the growing conflict in the Viet Nam peninsula. This helped generate a sort of euphoric mood and triggered the events that culminated in the signing of the Civil Rights Bill by Kennedy’s successor Lyndon Johnson. Pres. Johnson stated in his first address to a joint session of Congress, “No memorial oration or eulogy could more eloquently honor President Kennedy’s memory than the earliest possible passage of the civil rights bill for which he fought so long.”

 

The Powers to enforce the Civil Rights Act were weak in a beginning but were later supplemented using Congress to assert its authority under different parts of the constitution, like its power to regulate interstate commerce, guarantee equal protection under the law, and protect voting rights. Although the bill included provisions to ban discrimination in public accommodations and enabled the U.S. Attorney General to join lawsuits against state governments, civil rights activist considered that it didn’t go far enough because it did not support provisions granting the power to initiate desegregation actions against private entities.

 

One of the arguments by the opponents of the Civil Rights Bill was essentially that is would be used to bus children to achieve racial quotas and force integration. They stated that one can’t legislate morality, adding that it would violate individual rights and state freedoms specially. Proponents of the bill guaranteed that it would not authorize such measures, urging the sponsor of the bill Senator Hubert Humphrey to write two amendments to outlaw busing. He said, “if the bill were to compel it, it would be a violation of the Constitution, because it would be handling the matter on the basis of race”.  Two years later the Department of Health and Education said that Southern school districts would be required to meet mathematical ratios of students by busing.

It is never more obvious that these conflicts were generated by us, they are both real and negated by a larger environment setting up the chain reaction between the left and the right and a capacity and demand that alternate and change places. The Civil Rights Bill ended up integrating the environment into one of the most liberal concepts of collectivism yet, an amalgamation of the liberation wars, political resentment, communist ideology, and religious impetus. In his speech “I Have a Dream” Martin Luther King expresses the indelible liberal utopia which was weaponized regardless of what you think of the idea. 

“I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.

…I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today.

…I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.

This is our hope. . . With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. . . .

And when this happens, and when we allow freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual: “Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!”

This is a good sentiment but it just doesn’t work like that, and it does not happen overnight or because we have certain aspirations. This kind of integration depends on cultural relationships and socioeconomic conditions that only take place over hundreds of years, especially throughout such a vast space of land regardless of the concept of one humanity (which does have a role to play). This ends up being a huge contraction with the obvious results of the transcultural absolutism. The most absolute concept has incredible repressive potential if we don’t understand humans’ political and cultural essence.

Committee of 300

The Bank of England assumed control of the United States when its agent J.P. Morgan took over 25% of American business during the T.R. Roosevelt administration (1901-1909). The hackers were part of a network called the “Club of the Isles” which is a secret society of predominantly European aristocrats that includes the Queen. The Club of the Isles is thought to be a variation of the Committee of 300 founded by the British aristocracy in 1727. They are the heirs to the Venetian oligarchy, which infiltrated and subverted England from the period 1509-1715 establishing a new, more virulent, Anglo-Saxon strain of the oligarchic system of imperial Babylon, Persia, Rome, and Byzantium... The Financial Oligarchy behind the power of the Windsor throne.

 In 1917, Arthur Cherep-Spiridovich wrote in his book “The Secret Government or Hidden Hand” that it was headed by the Rothschild Family and International Financiers based loosely around many of the top national banking institutions and royal families of the world. Arthur Cherep Spiridovich was a Russian loyalist and author on metapolitics who moved to the United States following the Jewish usurpation in Russia in 1917.

The Committee of 300, also known as The Olympians, seem to be a variation of The Elders of Zion and the Red Menace. It is believed to be an international council that runs front organizations, government agencies, banks, insurance companies, international businesses, militaries, the petroleum industry, and thousands of other entities and foundations with the aim of controlling the world.

In more recent times The Club of Rome has been one of the most important foreign policy arms of the Committee of 300, along with the Bilderberger. It was put together on the basis of a call made by the late Aurellio Peccei for an urgent drive to speed up the plans of the One World Government. Peccei’s call was answered by the most subversive “future planners” drawn from the United States, France, Sweden, Britain, Switzerland and Japan that could be mustered. During the period 1968-1972, The Club of Rome became a hub of globalists, progressives and internationalists of every stripe. Peccei’s book “Human Quality” formed the basis of the doctrine adopted by NATO’s political wing. 

Central to the formation of the Club of Rome was Peccei’s concept of the problematic that viewing the problems of mankind individually and in isolation, or as “problems capable of being solved in their own terms”, was doomed to failure. “It is this generalized meta-problem (or meta-system of problems) which we have called and shall continue to call the “problematic” that inheres in our situation”. He referred to a “collective responsibility” which he them uses against the concept of independent nation-states to promote the elitist globalization.

Peccei never tired of preaching against the nation-state and how destructive they are for the progress of mankind. He called for “collective responsibility.” Nationalism was a cancer on man was the theme of several important speeches delivered by Peccei. His close friend Ervin Lazlo produced a work in 1977 in a similar vein which was called “Goals of Mankind,” a landmark study for the Club of Rome. The entire position paper was a vitriolic attack on industrial expansion and urban growth. Throughout these years, Kissinger, as the designated contact man, kept in close touch with Moscow on behalf of the RIIA. “Global modeling” papers were regularly shared with Kissinger’s friends in the Kremlin. 

The Committee of 300 had decided the multitudes of useless consumers depleting scarce natural resources were to be discarded in order to build a “better world”. This called for an attack upon Christianity; the slow disintegration of industrialized nations, the elimination of hundreds of millions of people referred to by the Committee of 300 as surplus population, and the removal of any leader who dared to stand in the way of the Committee’s plans to reach their global objectives.

They demand the suppression of all scientific development except for those deemed beneficial by the Committee for the requirements of the same. Especially targeted is the nuclear energy program as it relates to nuclear waste.  Nuclear power is because the Club of Rome called upon the environmentalist movement to wage a war on nuclear energy and provided also the financial support. If nuclear energy was cheap and abundant Third World countries would gradually become independent of U.S. foreign aid and begin to assert their sovereignty…. Less foreign aid would mean that nations couldt take control of their destiny which was an abhorrence to the Club of Rome. We have seen opposition to nuclear power in the United States successfully used to block industrial development in conformity with the Club’s “Postindustrial Zero-Growth” plans. 

They aim to cause by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, and by means of starvation and diseases in Third World countries, the death of 3 billion people, people they call useless eaters. Since the 2008 crash the starvation method has taken root in the first world countries also, all administered by the Zionist leaning, therefore a cult of Futurism network in the Evangelical cults. The Committee of 300 commissioned Cyrus Vance to write a paper on this subject of how best to bring about such genocide. The paper was produced under the title the Global 2000 Report and was accepted and approved for action by President Carter, for and on behalf of the US Government, and accepted by Edwin Muskie, then Secretary of State.

Under the terms of the Global 2000 Report, the population of the United States is to be reduced by 100 million by the year 2050.  They also aim to weaken the moral fiber of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labor class by creating mass unemployment. As jobs dwindle due to the postindustrial zero growth policies introduced by the Club of Rome, demoralized and discouraged workers will resort to alcohol and drugs.

The youth of the nations have been encouraged by means of music and gangster rap and the drugs that go with them to rebel against the status quo, thus undermining and destroying the family unit.  Next came the media obsession with sex and masculinity allowing for the changes in legal statutes of the married couple, eventually removing the male from the family unit enough to influence the children, who would be primed for the programs by corporate academia to be gay, bisexual, transsexuals, and prone to decadent lifestyles etc.…

In this regard the Committee of 300 commissioned the Tavistock Institute to prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. The “experiment” in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert, of the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on Community Relations. Their techniques are designed to break down the individual psychologically and render him helpless against the dictators of the New Order, break down their sense honor and patriotism, racial identity and cultural heritage. The program which was used as a weapon of mass control was labeled Aquarius.

The World Court were to make local institutions of lesser effect by gradually phasing them out or bringing them under the mantle of the United Nations. The mechanics of this method shall remain concealed in the use of unaccountable charitable trusts. Penetrate and subvert all governments, and work from within them to destroy the sovereign integrity of nations represented by them. Organize a world-wide terrorist apparatus and negotiate with terrorists whenever terrorist activities take place.

The Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions is an Olympian stronghold. Located in Santa Barbara, it is housed in what is affectionately called the Parthenon. Former Representative John Rarick called it an outfit loaded with Communists. By 1973 work on a new United States Constitution was in its thirty-fifth draft which proposes an amendment guaranteeing environmental rights, the thrust of which is to reduce the industrial base of the US to a mere whisper of what it was in 1969. In other words, this institution is carrying out Club of Rome zero-growth postindustrial policies laid down by the Committee of 300.

Some of its other aims are the control of economic cycles, welfare, regulation of business and national public works, control of pollution. Speaking on behalf of the Committee of 300, Ashmore says the function of the CSDI is to find ways and means of making our political system work, we must consider a new US Constitution and a Constitution for the world. . .

Age of Aquarius - Principia Discordia

The Illuminati group was founded in Germany in the 18^th century by Adam Weishaupt, an anti-clerical professor who allegedly wanted to limit the power of the Church over public life. It is said to be molded after the Freemason and some of the symbols associated with them are the number 666, the pyramid, goats and the all-seeing eye or eye of providence which appears on US bank notes. Among the members of the secret society are music and movie stars, industry tycoons, business leaders, and people in the highest echelons of government.

One of the main beliefs of Illuminati connoisseur is that the entire entertainment industry has been infiltrated and their members are using the media to promote decadence and brainwash the masses. In the past the Illuminati have been associated with psychedelic counter-culture of the 1960s, specifically a text called Principia Discordia, which could be consider the cradle of the neoliberal movement in America. The book celebrated an alternative life style that promotes a form of anarchism and gave birth to the Discordian Movement which purpose was to subvert the order and bringing chaos back into society, using entertainment and all portals of the media to challenging established convention through the countercultures.

The Principia Discordia holds three core principles: the Aneristic Principle (order), the Eristic Principle (disorder) and the notion that both are mere illusions. The following excerpt summarizes these principles:

The Aneristic Principle is that of apparent order; the Eristic Principle is that of apparent disorder. Both order and disorder are manmade concepts and are artificial divisions of pure chaos, which is a level deeper than is the level of distinction making.

With our concept-making apparatus called “the brain” we look at reality through the ideas-about-reality which our cultures give us. The ideas-about-reality are mistakenly labeled “reality” and unenlightened people are forever perplexed by the fact that other people, especially other cultures, see “reality” differently.

It is only the ideas-about-reality which differ. Real (capital-T) True reality is a level deeper than is the level of concept. We look at the world through windows on which have been drawn grids (concepts). Different philosophies use different grids. A culture is a group of people with rather similar grids. Through a window we view chaos, and relate it to the points on our grid, and thereby understand it. The order is in the grid. That is the Aneristic Principle.

Western philosophy is traditionally concerned with contrasting one grid with another grid, and amending grids in hopes of finding a perfect one that will account for all reality and will, hence, (say unenlightened westerners) be true. This is illusory; it is what we Erisians call the Aneristic Illusion. Some grids can be more useful than others, some more beautiful than others, some more pleasant than others, etc., but none can be more True than any other.

Disorder is simply unrelated information viewed through some particular grid. But, like “relation”, no-relation is a concept. Male, like female, is an idea about sex. To say that male-ness is “absence of female-ness”, or vice versa, is a matter of definition and metaphysically arbitrary. The artificial concept of no-relation is the Eristic Principle.

The belief that “order is true” and disorder is false or somehow wrong, is the Aneristic Illusion. To say the same of disorder, is the Eristic Illusion. The point is that (little-t) truth is a matter of definition relative to the grid one is using at the moment, and that (capital-T) Truth, metaphysical reality, is irrelevant to grids entirely. Pick a grid, and through it some chaos appears ordered and some appears disordered. Pick another grid, and the same chaos will appear differently ordered and disordered.

Reality is the original Rorschach. Verily! So much for all that. — Principia Discordia.

The Aquarian Conspiracy started in the 1990s by former MI6 agent John Coleman. A MI6 insider Coleman claimed the Beatles’ overwhelming transatlantic success was engineered by the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, a secretive organization dedicated to eroding American society. The former special agent argues that the institute’s Illuminati connections used the Fab Four to further its plan to promote “rock music and drugs” with the aim of “undermining and eventually destroying the family unit”, his book Tavistock the Best Keep Secret in America”” he states: The “experiment” in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert, of the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on Community Relations. The program was designed to break down the individual’s sense of personal knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage. Through the Stanford Research Institute, Tavistock controls the National Education Association. The Institute of Social Research at the National Training Lab brain washes the leading executives of business and government.

In more recent times Beyoncé and Jay Z have been accused of been part of the cult along with the whole Hip Hop and Rap industry. Researchers say they have found signs of the Illuminati Conspiracy in some the lyrics and hidden messages in the songs and albums covers. They also point out Beyoncé’s half-time performance at the 2013 Super Bowl as an example of devil-worshipping, even accusing her on-stage alter ego Sasha Fierce of being a demonic entity. Her recent performance at the Coachella music festival also fueled fears she was sending subliminal messages to promote a new apocalyptic world order. Among the clues are a circle over her eye, a costume sporting Egyptian symbolism and a ring which is said to have Satanic imagery.

Jay Z has also been accused of hiding secret symbols such as goats and devil horns in his videos, most notably the logo for his music label Roc-A-Fella Records which is a pyramid, further encouraging the theory of a widespread conspiracy involving rap music. Rihanna herself has been branded as one of the biggest agents of the satanic cult since the onset of her career. A protégé of Freemason Jay-Z she has been one of the biggest stars pushing the agenda of sexual immorality and illuminati imagery in her music.

Manly P. Hall considered one of the greatest Freemasonic philosophers and an expert on the occult said this with regard to symbolism in society: Symbolism is the language of the Mysteries; in fact it is the language not only of mysticism and philosophy but of all Nature, for every law and power active in universal procedure is manifested to the limited sense perceptions of man through the medium of symbol. Every form existing in the diversified sphere of being is symbolic of the divine activity by which it is produced. By symbols men have ever sought to communicate to each other those thoughts which transcend the imitations of language.

Rejecting man-conceived dialects as inadequate and unworthy to perpetuate divine ideas, the Mysteries thus chose symbolism as a far more ingenious and ideal method of preserving their transcendental knowledge. In a single figure a symbol may both reveal and conceal, for to the wise the subject of the symbol is obvious, while to the ignorant the figure remains inscrutable. Hence, he who seeks to unveil the secret doctrine of antiquity must search for that doctrine not upon the open pages of books which might fall into the hands of the unworthy but in the place where it was originally concealed. “The Secret Teachings of All Ages”, p. 38.

According to some conspiracy theories the black left eye is part of a cult or Illuminati initiation ritual called “soul scalping” during which the subject is forced to withstand pain in order to become powerful, politicians and entertainers who have sold their souls to Lucifer, which actually mean “contrary” or “antagonizing” in Hebrew.  Since medieval times, the black eye has been associated with the “devil’s mark” as well as ancient Egyptian religious imagery, most notably that of the Sun god Horus, whose black left eye represented the moon. The bruised left eye which is also referred to as the “Illuminati shiner” is allegedly a mark given to those who have scaled their way to the top of the pyramid. Elizabeth Hurley, Boy George and Robert Downey Jr are among those who have been seen sporting a left eye bruise recently along with the Pope, and let’s not forget Jorge W. Bush, Senator John McCain, and Lisa Left Eye from the group TLC, who died mysteriously in a car accident in Honduras.

The story of how the Illuminati first ended up in a rap song is a lot like your average Illuminati conspiracy: There’s a byzantine plot and a shifting cast of somewhat famous characters with varying allegiances and interests.  In the 1995 remix to LL Cool J’s “I Shot Ya,” Mobb Deep’s Prodigy lyrics sparked interest in the Illuminati conspiracy on Hip Hop, specifically the quote “Illuminati want my mind, soul, and my body.”

It was the first time the Illuminati had been mentioned like that and marked the beginning of an entirely new era in the hip-hop industry, one as enlightened as paranoid. Prodigy was referring to the Illuminati conspiracy theory: the idea that a network of powerful individuals bent on controlling society are rebuilding it as a totalitarian worldwide government. Around the same time, CeeLo Green made reference to it on “Cell Therapy,” claiming, “Traces of the New World Order…Time is getting shorter if we don’t get prepared…People it’s gon’ be a slaughter.” Mentions of the Illuminati spiked from there: Jay Z sampled Prodigy’s line from “I Shot Ya” for “D’Evils” on his 1996 debut Reasonable Doubt and U-God encouraged listeners to “get your shit together before the fuckin’ Illuminati hit” in 1997 on Wu-Tang Clan’s “Impossible.” 

The fervor died down a bit until 2008 when Prodigy published an open letter he’d written in jail to URB Magazine alleging that his old rival Jay promoted the lifestyle of the beast. This trend seems to have crossed into pop culture as well. Its symbols consistently evoked in music videos and press photos, the triangle, the horns, the eyes. There’s an endless stream of books and blogs about the Illuminati’s use of media and entertainment to carry out its agenda, and innumerable YouTube videos. The Illuminati is always somehow part of the conversation when a celebrity like Whitney Houston or Prince passes away prematurely.

When Prince died unexpectedly of an alleged overdose some accused the Illuminati of killing the singer who was famous for fiercely protecting his copyrights and artistic freedom from the industry. In 2009, the singer had also appeared on TV warning of powerful mystery figures controlling the world through “chemtrails”, chemicals pumped into the air via jet planes to manipulate human behavior. Others like David Icke claim the Moon is a forward base for an intelligent reptilian species that has been controlling world leaders and manipulation mankind. He has also made a connection between Saturn and Satan, as in The Lord of the Ring. He also believed they actually took on the physical form of humans as opposed to control of our minds with advance technologies, which is a little farfetched.

The truth is that humanity has been hacked and these are only pieces of much complicated reality even members of the Illuminati are not aware of, so we become more speculative and come up with new theories about the phenomenon, as along as the masters remain hidden, the invisible hand pulling the strings. Beyoncé’s song “To the Left” speaks to the psychology behind the Age of Aquarius and the commoditization of the left. Her name itself is likely to symbolize a world Beyond Cuba, which was the epicenter of the cold war in the western hemisphere, the video also contains images reminiscent of Cuba.

Once upon a time these messages were encrypted in paintings by Davinci, official documents and other structures, but today they manifest themselves in new art forms and means of communications... In the movie “Split” the main character lays the flowers at the memory of the collective and the beast emerges from the empty train to eat human flesh, but he won’t kill the girl as long as she hurts herself. In other words, as long as we keep hurting ourselves and remain on the manic-depressive path.

  

The song Hotel California by the Eagles has confounded generations like the metaphysical currency deep in our soul, suggesting somethings else is out there beyond our reach…” She lit up a candle and she showed me the way…This could be haven or this could be hell” is a reference to the Statue of Liberty and the religious dichotomy, and the beast that once again engenders in the bowels of the Eagle.

  

The black giant with the simple mind tormented by the crimes of humanity and the breath of a thousand deaths waits to be executed on death row. The Green Mile is about the apocalyptic end on the pain and redemption trail represented by the electric chair, the green currency, and the commoditization of the African American man.

The Phoenix is reborn from the ashes of history with one purpose only to bring chaos back into society. In demolition man Wesley Snipes character (Phoenix) with the blond hair and the two-colored eyes reflecting the liberal dichotomy and the split personality is brought out of hibernation to kill Friendly the leader of the rebellion. We are also made to hate the absurdly Antiseptic future and Taco Bell is the only restaurant left.

Handcock the black super hero who is an alcoholic and can remember his past. He’s socially awkward and fights the white girl almost to the death. They need to stay away from each other or they will both die. Maybe because he received a blow to the head in nineteen twelve in Miami. No need to break down the name I think it speaks for itself.

The soon to come out Alita which means “little wings” in Spanish is also about the transhumanist agenda and the right and the left polarization. Again, the morally deprived semi-human or hybrid that pulls on our hearts, making us decide if it’s human enough or just another killer robot. We see the personality split and the parasitic approach in Venom, where the gruesome act of consuming a human being is turned into some kind of superhero.

While they lay out their apocalyptic plans for humanity there is an implicit message that reflect their super ego and speaks to the silence. “Knowing” is as much a concealed threat as the stories they want us to believe about their role as the saviors of humanity. That’s how they get to play good and evil with the willing lamb in their dark hearts and the vacuum of knowledge. 

The Mask is also about putting on the green mask, see what kind of monster of superhero you become. In Scape from Los Angeles the main character holds the mobile that hasn’t been invented yet in his hands and calls the postindustrial dark ages. Cuba shows up again in both of them as the epicenter of their master piece and post apocalyptic new world.

In The Butterfly Effect a bomb explodes and the man characters discovers that he can go back in time to fix the problems, but each alternative reality comes with even more dire consequences, depicting the time paradox. In World War Z the last bastion of freedom is Zion which is where the movie takes its name from. Once again “the girl” loses the left arm which we also seen in Fury Road and the sociopath zombies reflect the reaction from that side. You have to be infected with the virus so they don’t devour you.

Lucy and Transcendence talk about the delusion and the commoditization of our personal powers, how we vanish into some kind of spirit or digital form in the end. At some point Lucy comes into contact with her primal self and the explosion occurs reflecting the time paradox again. The name of the movie itself is a reference to the two million years old fossilized remains of a human ancestor that were found in Africa. Lucy and Transcendence give us a good sense of the transhumanist agenda as well as Venom and Split.

The Predicament of Enrichment

Whatever you think about capitalism we forgot a long time ago how to do it any other way. We can talk about regulations and taxes but it’s a different kind of decadence that concerns me, one that produces the kind of moral deficit we don’t bounce back from. We could talk about ideology to exhaustion but the same left that demands coverage for everyone at the same time supporting open borders and safe havens from the federal government I think is paradoxical. Then I realized that they might’ve been pushed to some extremes and they find the solution in a memory that sends them way back in time, one that also plays the general sense of quilt of a system with recent history of oppression.

 

At some point I realized that the struggle between the past and the future is not just about the things we believe and our aspirations but also about the commitments we make, and that when we take a more global approach we can digress and generate the inadvertent enrichment, because it all depends on a sense of history and continuity. I am attempting to point out the differences between strained economic relationships and a code of conduct that is at the core of civilized society, the economic freedoms that helps us disambiguate and a morality associated with imminent domain and the culture, and the tensions therein. For one almost anything that is material can be traded while virtue is the opposite, comes with caring as part of a collective bargaining.

 
One of the best ways to appreciate some of these dynamics is the controversy surrounding Charter Schools. They should not be a replacement of public education but a contribution to a strained system; something we can do to meet a very high demand. In other words, use it to support your main argument. In this case it cannot be seen as the main source because it can produce the negative enrichment, meaning it can become very expensive and will not accommodate most of the students. We can also talk about Brexit; in principle there is no right or wrong, if the point is to reinforce relationships conducive to the collective development you can probably go either way, but it would require the right development and political structures. Changing the approach could become more expensive, and the longer we stick with certain commitments the more expensive it becomes to abandon the road. They could get caught in the untenable situation and be taken apart between the special interest and the national welfare. It probably would not make sense either for Puerto Rico to secede from the American union after one hundred years committed to this path, although it might’ve been an option at some point.

 

When it comes to economic agreements, we seem to have the right notion; the entities involved would have to have a similar degree of social and economic development. Even if we are determined to help someone out of a difficult situation, we need certain provisions to protect ourselves and stay ahead of the exhaust-decay curve, so that it does not resume to an undesirable place or completely destabilizes the economic relationships. It is actually about managing risk and cost which requires an understanding of the situation and the coefficient that comes from technology and a capacity.

 

Reactionary trade is not free or fair trade, but capitalism per say is not going to destroy the world, not anymore. We’ve been going down this road too long and deficit is way too big. In other words, is too late and we can only hope to curve the demand. The most noble idea can be commoditized and the older the memory the more subversive it becomes, which favors a more reactionary right which is usually confined by a left with more subversive potential. We can get into the ideological argument about the commoditization of ownership or look at the socioeconomic impact over the years, the train wreck. It is a little bit of semantics but capitalism is also the known quantity that becomes crucial as a part of a longer history, we just get caught in the “religious” orthodoxy and chasing the currency again.

 

This might be a concession of times passed and opportunities gone but is also a more global approach which also becomes increasingly necessary. Generally, things can be subversive if they are obscene or disparaging, but also if they happen too fast or it has been too long since. If they are too aggressive, too much or too many, “shorting the ground” which defines what is urgent and the present. It can close the distance or charge the environment, is the clothes we wear and the rights we like, and the political boundaries that allow us to move. It can short-out the system or shock it back to life, excite it or animate it which depends on a timing and placement, and it is money as well. It can be positive or negative and if you keep trying to prove the negative you go insane, so you need the consistency. It is also the “absolute” and as long as your proof hasn’t been replaced with something better it remains your truth and the best way to survive.

 

Take Venezuela for instance; an egalitarian revolution in the context of an antiimperialist movement or war of liberation is conceivable, but a communist revolution is technically a revolution of the proletariat based on a degree of industrialization and cultural development, a socioeconomic coefficient related also to population and a potential that might not exist for as many reasons. Rounding up to the lowest common denominator would not produce anything, the cost of the enrichment would take care of it really fast as it falls short collected by the global super-capitalism where industries are traded and states negotiated. Calling for a national dialogue comes to mind but as long as people believe in the canonized democracy is very difficult too. Could these communist revolutions in Latin America with their Nationalist undertones be an overreaction to the living conditions of many or could they simply be caught trying to do too much in little time and in some kind of gnostic delusion, and speculation? Even the concept of overreaction is relative as we reach back for a consensus that might no longer be available in its original form. One thing remains true though people suffer through generations in the measure we can’t curb the difficulties for something that never materializes not to mention the cultural shock.

 

Freedom is the cognitive development that produces the access we have not been able to produce. I have often talked about the price of polarization, progressive initiatives come at a cost that is also part of the exhaust/decay that can send you back to the expensive frivolous “trading”. Although the cost could be established by the enrichment and not necessarily by the universal nature of the principle, it matters. It matters so that we don’t charge the legacy or give up on the principles, and it is only in that magnitude we can understand it, where the deficits are huge and the national debt unpayable. Again, we are talking about a cost that is implicit to the socioeconomic system and requires that we think in a different order of magnitude today in order to catch up.

 

At some point we do need the strategic realignment to reconcile reality, so we have to be aware of the socioeconomic condition and the damage done by colonization, the slave trade and displacement of the culture, or we will just be applying a tourniquet to the gangrene. It is only in that magnitude we can understand it, which brings us back to collective bargaining and the transit of time. Ideally, we would be able to displace the inflation to other activities and prioritize health, food and housing, and in the measure we develop find ways to subsidize other priorities, which would bring us to a debt ceiling and the deficit problem, and the only answer which is aggregating value. It’s not just about the absolute nature of some principles but the choices we have made over time.

 

Before the word capitalisms even existed, restaurants existed, and taverns existed, and we even used coins to trade, some places in Europe are still open after four or five hundred years. Capitalism is the incentive to destabilize the environment in order to maximize the dividends which produces its own negation which eventually become counterintuitive depending on the conditions and level of desperation. The principle engenders in our need for trade and in the context of the chain reaction becomes itself the inadvertent all-encompassing generalization that justifies the deterioration and doesn’t show you the whole trajectory, the dogma. So, it’s the drug versus the effects of the addiction.

 

I don’t care what is called but we should not give up on the idea of re-stabilizing the environment and the capacity to trade based on economic coefficients and level of development, as opposed to the pervasive consumption. A revolution of the proletariat was not a formula for underdeveloped countries and artisanal economies either; we could not apply it in India for instance, or places where you have to resolve a million other conflicts and overcome other differences and deficits in a much smaller time window. We can get caught in the intractable situation, between where we think we ought to be and where we really are and in complete imbalance with the ecosystem, back in the fork on the road. What is worse, it could become the moment of proof and source of enrichment for the very system it opposes.

 

Socialist economic systems can be divided into non-market and market forms. Non-market socialism or communism involves the replacement of the deterministic market with engineering and technical criteria, thereby producing an economic mechanism that functions according to different from those of capitalism. It is a complete departure from the accumulation of wealth and the inefficiencies traditionally associated with capitalism and the profit system. This is impossible today, the best chance it had of stablishing a different criterion was during the days of the Soviet Union and the socialist block. By contrast market socialism retains the use of the money factor and in some cases the profit motive, with respect to the operation of socially owned enterprises. The problem it faces is that as soon as it starts reducing consumption the big enterprises and distribution lanes lack the resources to deal in the international market.

 

Although I think market socialism could be the answer, it immediately starts running a deficit, as soon as we invest in infrastructure and social programs, so we need a better global argument for the huge enrichment and financing system. It eventually demands a new paradigm, generating the internal conflict that has to unfold into some form of virtue where we share the pain and time. The socialist system generates pressures in the opposite direction of the apocalyptic markets and there is always an angular mismatch, these dynamics are similar to the ones we must’ve encounter at one point in our evolution, and in some ways we remember. When countries like Spain or France enter into a greater union particularly to be able to compete with monsters like United States, they relieve pressure temporarily as the deficit is shared but are probably one step further from being able to subsidize social programs and real economic integration (without the right adjustments). Even Russia with its in-between oligarchical system might just still have a cash flow problem. 

 

Utopian socialism is often described as the presentation of imaginary or futuristic ideal societies. The term is most often applied to those socialists who lived in the first quarter of the 19^th century who were labeled as “utopian” as a pejorative term in order to imply naiveté and dismiss their ideas as unrealistic. Later socialists and critics of utopian socialism viewed utopian socialism as not being grounded in actual material conditions of existing society, and in some cases, as reactionary. What is territorial power in the digital era, asks a supporter of the European Union, from Brussels I might add. – I say, isn’t that the problem? The transient condition of the information and the effects of technology on human development, how it best applies to the human condition and enhances our own intuition, to our political condition. The liberal transhumanism that is now taken to a digital level.

 

Modern European socialism, usually known as Eurosocialism, is the dominant version of social democracy in the European Union. It is a political position drawing on currencies such as “social justice” and “progress” primarily opposed by conservatives. European socialists are defined with one or more of the following terms: social democrats, liberal socialists, social liberals and Christian socialists. They support the values of a Europeanism and have the goal to establish a Liberal Federalism.

 

Analyzing the advice a performance artist gave her young teenage audience to “be proud of who they were and embrace their individuality”, I asked myself, is that a good or bad advice for such young crowd. I didn’t hear stay in school and don’t do drugs for instance. Then I realized that the same principles apply. It is neither, it depends on a set of circumstances and whether the children can internalize the advised as part of the human condition and much bigger picture, or the advice has become insidious and pervasive. While there is potential in the trans-idiosyncratic moment, in the word, in the deed, in the rights, they cannot deny a more permanent reality and conventional wisdom.

 

If you become more intuitive “the word” takes the initiative and you can express a millinery wisdom and be free in that truth, but the default remains the absolute and there is no bigger truth than now. This also means that the commitments we make are very important and a “monopoly” can only be defined by a coefficient at any given moment in our development. A company as big as Apple is neither right nor wrong, that depends on the relationship with society regardless of any inherent value. Generally, we have the capacity for many generalizations but can arrive at these conclusions in many different ways, which is how the predicament of enrichment manifests itself in our social evolution.

 

If we use hurricane Maria and Puerto Rico as a micro cosmos, two billion dollars would probably fix the problem in six months, but we can’t continue to spend (free) money at the same rate indefinitely because it would cause too much speculation. So, the answer is we need less money and the infrastructure has to be built to last in order to get back to a more relaxed state. If we continue to extrapolate this dynamic of excitement and relaxation would cause a potential problem with payments and interest rates on loans in a deterministic environment; would not only force us to maintain the pace but produce a surplus of money. This phenomenon forces us to lower the expectations and produces the pollution; even migrations have to curbed, the low wages low skill jobs we like to point at some much are the result of a rush to bottom that is always in conflict with progress and automation keeping us from defining the standard of quality and arrive and the right development.

 

Collective bargaining becomes necessary with growth and proliferation, similarly money would have to gain a value that curves the volume. This means that interest rates could get ahead of the rising cost of living, but that’s a nonstarter, the next place we try to stabilize these relationships is minimum wages but they can’t get ahead of the rising cost of living either, like taxation they have the devaluation problem. If we cannot reconcile the numbers on an interest rate or minimum wage level it must take place at the bottom on an infrastructure level, with the implicit question what to do with the extra time. When we try to reconcile these values, they point at a distant future and to the absolute at the same time, and that’s where we are get caught between the learning curve and the losing value of the known quantity.

 

This means that social programs must start by addressing cost on a supply level and buy wholesale. Buying bulk is the only way to cover more people and things like health care, buying bulk mean the currency is worth more, giving us the coefficient. Otherwise we are talking about viral proliferation and the speculative conjugation, the repressive integration of the environment that is the rising prices. While the trap is in the strategic realignment and finding the balance, we cannot address the enrichment disconnected from the very high demand of today either, no matter how steep the curve. Let’s make it clear we are caught between the past and the future, the imperative to grow and the superlative to hold, the known quantity and the inflation, the right and the left.