Principia Discordia and the Age of Aquarius- Illuminati

The Illuminati group was founded in Germany in the 18^th century by Adam Weishaupt, an anti-clerical professor who allegedly wanted to limit the power of the Church over public life. It is said to be molded after the Freemason and some of the symbols associated with them are the number 666, the pyramid, goats and the all-seeing eye or eye of providence which appears on US bank notes. Among the members of the secret society are music and movie stars, industry tycoons, business leaders, and people in the highest echelons of government.

 

One of the main beliefs of Illuminati connoisseur is that the entire entertainment industry has been infiltrated and their members are using the media to promote decadence and brainwash the masses. In the past the Illuminati have been associated with psychedelic counterculture of the 1960s, specifically a text called Principia Discordia. The book celebrated an alternative lifestyle that promotes a form of anarchism and gave birth to the Discordian Movement which purpose was to subvert the order and bring chaos to society using the countercultures, challenge the establish and conventional through comedy all forms of media, a precursor of today’s liberal agenda.

 

Principia Discordia, which means discord, is a sort of pseudoscience full of half-truths intended to promotes ignorance and confusion, feed into the mystery and gnostic delusion. It is based on three core principles, the Aneristic Principle which represents “order”, the Eristic Principle which stands for “disorder”, and the notion that both are mere illusions, therefore reality is not real but what each person wants it to be. The following passages from Principia Discordia summarize these principles.

 

“The Aneristic Principle is that of apparent order; the Eristic Principle is that of apparent disorder. Both order and disorder are manmade concepts and are artificial divisions of pure chaos, which is a level deeper than is the level of distinction making.

 

With our concept-making apparatus called “the brain” we look at reality through the ideas-about-reality which our cultures give us. The ideas-about-reality are mistakenly labeled “reality” and unenlightened people are forever perplexed by the fact that other people, especially other cultures, see “reality” differently.

 

It is only the ideas about reality which differ. Real (capital-T) True reality is a level deeper than is the level of concept. We look at the world through windows on which have been drawn grids (concepts). Different philosophies use different grids. A culture is a group of people with rather similar grids. Through a window we view chaos, and relate it to the points on our grid, and thereby understand it. The order is in the grid. That is the Aneristic Principle.

 

Western philosophy is traditionally concerned with contrasting one grid with another grid, and amending grids in hopes of finding a perfect one that will account for all reality and will, hence, (say unenlightened westerners) be true. This is illusory; it is what we Erisians call the Aneristic Illusion. Some grids can be more useful than others, some more beautiful than others, some more pleasant than others, etc., but none can be more True than any other.

 

Disorder is simply unrelated information viewed through some particular grid. But, like “relation”, no-relation is a concept. Male, like female, is an idea about sex. To say that male-ness is “absence of female-ness”, or vice versa, is a matter of definition and metaphysically arbitrary. The artificial concept of no-relation is the Eristic Principle.

 

The belief that “order is true” and disorder is false or somehow wrong, is the Aneristic Illusion. To say the same of disorder, is the Eristic Illusion. The point is that truth is a matter of definition relative to the grid one is using at the moment, and that Truth, metaphysical reality, is irrelevant to grids entirely. Pick a grid, and through it some chaos appears ordered and some appears disordered. Pick another grid, and the same chaos will appear differently ordered and disordered.”

 

   Age of Aquarius

 

The Aquarian Conspiracy started in the 1990s by former MI6 agent John Coleman. A MI6 insider Coleman claimed the Beatles’ overwhelming transatlantic success was engineered by the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations; a secretive organization dedicated to eroding American society. The former special agent argues that the institute’s Illuminati connections used the Fab Four to further its plan to promote “rock music and drugs” with the aim of “undermining and eventually destroying the family unit”, his book Tavistock the Best Keep Secret in America”” he states: The “experiment” in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert, of the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on Community Relations. The program was designed to break down the individual’s sense of personal knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage. Through the Stanford Research Institute, Tavistock controls the National Education Association. The Institute of Social Research at the National Training Lab brainwashes the leading executives of business and government.

 

In more recent times Beyoncé and Jay Z have been accused of been part of the cult along with the whole Hip Hop and Rap industry. Researchers say they have found signs of the Illuminati Conspiracy in some of the lyrics and hidden messages in the songs and albums covers. They also point out Beyoncé’s half-time performance at the 2013 Super Bowl as an example of devil-worshipping, even accusing her on-stage alter ego Sasha Fierce of being a demonic entity. Her recent performance at the Coachella music festival also fueled fears she was sending subliminal messages to promote a new apocalyptic world order. Among the clues are a circle over her eye, a costume sporting Egyptian symbolism and a ring which is said to have Satanic imagery.

 

Jay Z has also been accused of hiding secret symbols such as goats and devil horns in his videos, most notably the logo for his music label Roc-A-Fella Records which is a pyramid, further encouraging the theory of a widespread conspiracy involving rap music. Rihanna herself has been branded as one of the biggest agents of the satanic cult since the onset of her career. A protégé of Freemason Jay-Z she has been one of the biggest stars pushing the agenda of sexual immorality and illuminati imagery in her music.

 

Manly P. Hall considered one of the greatest Freemasonic philosophers and an expert on the occult said this with regard to symbolism in society: Symbolism is the language of the Mysteries; in fact it is the language not only of mysticism and philosophy but of all Nature, for every law and power active in universal procedure is manifested to the limited sense perceptions of man through the medium of symbol. Every form existing in the diversified sphere of being is symbolic of the divine activity by which it is produced. By symbols men have ever sought to communicate to each other those thoughts which transcend the imitations of language.

 

Rejecting man-conceived dialects as inadequate and unworthy to perpetuate divine ideas, the Mysteries thus chose symbolism as a far more ingenious and ideal method of preserving their transcendental knowledge. In a single figure a symbol may both reveal and conceal, for to the wise the subject of the symbol is obvious, while to the ignorant the figure remains inscrutable. Hence, he who seeks to unveil the secret doctrine of antiquity must search for that doctrine not upon the open pages of books which might fall into the hands of the unworthy but in the place where it was originally concealed. “The Secret Teachings of All Ages”, p. 38.

 

According to some conspiracy theories the black left eye is part of a cult or Illuminati initiation ritual called “soul scalping” during which the subject is forced to withstand pain in order to become powerful, politicians and entertainers who have sold their souls to Lucifer, which actually mean “contrary” or “antagonizing” in Hebrew.  Since medieval times, the black eye has been associated with the “devil’s mark” as well as ancient Egyptian religious imagery, most notably that of the Sun god Horus, whose black left eye represented the moon. The bruised left eye, which is also referred to as the “Illuminati shiner” is allegedly a mark given to those who have scaled their way to the top of the pyramid. Elizabeth Hurley, Boy George and Robert Downey Jr are among those who have been seen sporting a left eye bruise recently along with the Pope, and let’s not forget Jorge W. Bush, Senator John McCain, and Lisa Left Eye from the group TLC, who died mysteriously in a car accident.

 

The story of how the Illuminati first ended up in a rap song is a lot like your average Illuminati conspiracy: There’s a byzantine plot and a shifting cast of somewhat famous characters with varying allegiances and interests.  In the 1995 remix to LL Cool J’s “I Shot Ya”, Mobb Deep’s Prodigy lyrics sparked interest in the Illuminati conspiracy on Hip Hop, specifically the quote “Illuminati want my mind, soul, and my body.”

It was the first time the Illuminati had been mentioned like that and marked the beginning of an entirely new era in the hip-hop industry, one as enlightened as paranoid. Prodigy was referring to the Illuminati conspiracy theory: the idea that a network of powerful individuals bent on controlling society are rebuilding it as a totalitarian worldwide government. Around the same time, CeeLo Green made reference to it on “Cell Therapy,” claiming, “Traces of the New World Order…Time is getting shorter if we don’t get prepared…People it’s gon’ be a slaughter.” Mentions of the Illuminati spiked from there: Jay Z sampled Prodigy’s line from “I Shot Ya” for “D’Evils” on his 1996 debut Reasonable Doubt and U-God encouraged listeners to “get your shit together before the fuckin’ Illuminati hit” in 1997 on Wu-Tang Clan’s “Impossible.” 

 

The fervor died down a bit until 2008 when Prodigy published an open letter he’d written in jail to URB Magazine alleging that his old rival Jay promoted the lifestyle of the beast. This trend seems to have crossed into pop culture as well. Its symbols consistently evoked in music videos and press photos, the triangle, the horns, the eyes. There’s an endless stream of books and blogs about the Illuminati’s use of media and entertainment to carry out its agenda, and innumerable YouTube videos. The Illuminati is always somehow part of the conversation when a celebrity like Whitney Houston or Prince passes away prematurely.

 

When Prince died unexpectedly of an alleged overdose some accused the Illuminati of killing the singer who was famous for fiercely protecting his copyrights and artistic freedom from the industry. In 2009, the singer had also appeared on TV warning of powerful mystery figures controlling the world through “chemtrails”, chemicals pumped into the air via jet planes to manipulate human behavior. Others like David Icke claim the Moon is a forward base for an intelligent reptilian species that has been controlling world leaders and manipulation mankind. He has also made a connection between Saturn and Satan, as in The Lord of the Ring. He also believed they actually took on the physical form of humans as opposed to control of our minds with advanced technologies, which is my experience with this phenomenon.

 

The truth is that humanity has been hacked and these are only pieces of a much-complicated reality even members of the Illuminati are not aware of it completely, so we become more speculative and come up with new theories about the phenomenon, as along as the masters remain hidden, the invisible hand pulling the strings. Beyoncé’s song “To the Left” speaks to the psychology behind the Age of Aquarius and the commoditization of the progressive left.

 

Once upon a time these messages were encrypted in paintings by Davinci, works of literatures and other art forms, but today they manifest themselves in new forms of expressions and communication, especially Hollywood and the entertainment industry: In the movie “Split” the main character lays the flowers at the memory of the collective and the beast emerges from the empty train to eat human flesh, but he won’t kill the girl as long as she hurts herself. In other words, as long as we keep hurting ourselves and remain on the manic-depressive path.

  

The song Hotel California by the Eagles has confounded generations like the metaphysical currency deep in our soul, suggesting somethings else is out there beyond our reach…”She lit up a candle and she showed me the way…This could be haven or this could be hell” is a reference to the Statue of Liberty and the religious dichotomy, and the beast that once again engenders in the bowels of the Eagle.

  

The black giant with the simple mind tormented by the crimes of humanity and the breath of a thousand deaths waits to be executed on death row. The Green Mile is about the apocalyptic end on the pain and redemption trail represented by the electric chair, the green currency, and the commoditization of the African American man.

The Phoenix is reborn from the ashes of history with one purpose only to bring chaos back into society. In demolition man Wesley Snipes character Phoenix with the blond hair and eyes of different colors, reflecting the liberal dichotomy and split personality, is brought out of hibernation to kill Friendly the leader of the rebellion. We are also made to hate the absurdly antiseptic future and Taco Bell is the only restaurant left.

The soon to come out Alita which means “little wings” in Spanish is also about the transhumanist agenda and the right and the left polarization. Again, the morally deprived semi-human or hybrid that pulls on our hearts, making us decide if it’s human enough or just another killer robot. We again see the personality split and the parasitic approach in Venom, where the gruesome act of consuming human beings is turned into some kind of superhero.

While they lay out their apocalyptic plans for humanity there is an implicit message that reflects their superego and speaks to the silence imposed on us. “Knowing” is as much a concealed threat as it is the story they want us to believe about their role as the saviors of humanity. That’s how they get to play good and evil with the willing lamb in their dark hearts and the vacuum of knowledge. 

The Mask is also about putting on the green mask, see what kind of monster of superhero you become. In Scape from Los Angeles the main character holds the cell phone that hasn’t been invented yet in his hands and calls the postindustrial dark ages. Cuba shows up in both of them as the epicenter of their masterpiece and postapocalyptic New World Order.

In The Butterfly Effect a bomb explodes and the man characters discovers that he can go back in time to fix the problems, but each alternative reality comes with even more dire consequences, reflecting the time paradox, the center piece of the assault. In World War Z the last bastion of freedom is Zion which is where the movie takes its name from. Once again “the girl” loses the left arm (which we also seen in Fury Road) and the sociopath zombies reflect the reaction from the new progressive left. You have to be infected with the virous so they don’t devour you.

Lucy and Transcendence talk about the delusion and the commoditization of our individual powers, how we vanish into some kind of digital form, or spirit, in the end. At some point Lucy comes into contact with her primal self and the explosion occurs producing the time paradox again. The name of the movie itself is a reference to the two million years old fossilized remains of a human ancestor that were found in Africa. Lucy and Transcendence give us a good sense of the transhumanist agenda as well as Venom and Split.

 

 

The Liberal Utopia

Generally, we have a problem with the liberal utopia and the broken border anarchist, the subversive product of exile and misfortune and the ignominious integration (of the unscrupulous dogmas). This produced the fundamentalist but also the cultural decline that will wash away every semblance of western culture. Compelled by the logic of pain progressives today are more mistaken than ever, they get cultural diversity wrong and the concept of equality and tolerance wrong, and it is hard to pinpoint the bigot and the sinner in the high-risk environment they’ve created where everybody needs to be corrected or reformed. Of all the conflicts though, it seems that the idiosyncratic conflict is the prevalent one, that in the context of the global doctrines we find communion in produces the crisis of conscience; the ethnic and religious scourge that has plagued the world. There are ghettos forming in London and Paris and in other places like Barcelona where they don’t even want to speak the language anymore.

 

Today more than ever we must hold on to the known quantity especially as the options become more speculative. The known quantity that while increasingly distorted has been vilified and becomes protectionism, tribalism, xenophobia, racism, and other currencies we once knew as traditions, culture, countries, and nations. As the superlative axis is displaced by the “end of days globalist” things take on a different relative value and what used to be on the left is on the right and vice versa. We can see that they still have some of the same attributes but now relate differently to the environment, expressing a resistance to the alienating pressures of the deterministic market that always resumes to “a right” (or integrates into a tradition).

 

From the beginning it was easy to commoditize progressive’s “higher calling” as part of the low coefficient utopia and irrational determinism. As part of the Immaculate Conception they misallocate the source of moral values which seem to be absent or at best diluted in some subhuman notion where cultural idiosyncrasies become the diversity orthodoxy, along with a whole new list of virtues and sins. Don’t get me wrong I don’t like the fundamentalist or the fire breathing legal eagle that started the fire, but I know who they are. The self-righteous Hollywood hypocrite putting out the poison with one hand and pointing the finger with the other, that’s a dangerous one. The one crossing the border to ask for reforms, the one giving my daughter a condom in school, or selling marijuana, the one claiming the apocalyptic rights and flipping the script one affront at a time, one superhero at a time, one wink from Lucifer at a time, with every role reversal and every new leading man, insulting my intelligence with a concocted recipe of trans-idiosyncratic revisions and pieces of love on a shrine, as it all fades out to nothing.  

 

The right integration doesn’t take place and we keep adding with the fratricidal rights to the tensions, and just like the financial markets the deficit compounds and the hole gets bigger, and we walk ourselves into the same intractable situation where we need another even more repressive generalization to make ends meet, a higher price in a smaller time window. The one that only brings the price down if we sell a thousand times more, the price of the viral proliferation that never lets you go back completely, the generalization without the simplification. Other things contribute to the enrichment, huge highways leading to the axis of economic power that disassembled the small towns and cities, the small business owner and the day-to-day activity of normal society. The suburban phenomenon that started in the fifties encouraged by the speed of the automobile generating a dependency on structures that won’t keep up and the expectation we then attribute to social “minimum wage” and a distorted sense of justice and equality.

 

The financial system in spite of having become part of our cultures also evolved from the same divinity of doubt capable of eviscerating its own institutions. As a tradition it can make the price prohibitive but as the orthodoxy of pain and penance necessary and even inevitable. And that’s the predicament on every level, the one that drives up the prices and implies that we understand it and curb the demand. The economic imperialist would have us find refuge in globalization while holding on to the known quantity becomes increasingly difficult.

 

Capitalists argue that the capitalist system is based on actual demand while in the socialist system demand is determined by a bureaucratic government which often gets it wrong.  In the capitalist system, the argument is that people have the power to buy the products, or not, so they would have the final saying in the success or failure of any given company. The truth is that we could say capitalism is the manifest destiny of the currency which soon starts generating its own demand, and that’s why is so difficult to define. The argument only refers to one demand but does not say anything about the other demand, the alienating (nominal) count that eventually takes over. The amount of money you need to make ends meet which is an actual number.

 

The basic foundation of the system, which is that supply and demand will drive prices down and stabilize the market is not necessarily true. The interaction between the supply and demand of money tends to drive prices up and overwhelms the actual supply and demand they seem to refer to, which expresses the tendency to reduce the prices of the products very extemporaneously. A very expensive plasma TV becomes popular and a lot less expensive within a couple of years, then the price starts going up with inflation.

In reality money creates its own demand and products we don’t really need but want, the best example would be the automobile but since they have become so pervasive we’ll look for more obvious things like luxury resorts, million-dollar yachts, and the big mansions. How do you justify these products with the supply and demand argument?  We could mention other products associated with the fashion and entertainment industries or the gas-consuming pickup trucks we drive for sports in the cities, and many more. The argument is true for a moment until money gets traction generating a volume and the addiction, the excesses and speculation. A good example of this cognitive entanglement would be the pharmaceutical industry dogged determination to turn Americans into addicts and over commercialization of drugs.

 

These diverging values can be seen everywhere. An apartment for lease in an upscale neighborhood for ten thousand dollars can imply a whole host of things associated with your social status and the culture itself. The amount is abstract but it can express some real value which is where we get tangled up. It can reflect your educational level and the nature of your employment for instance, but it can also express the degree of decadence and social conditions unique to your environment. Principles reflected in the system of laws and other priorities.

 

Immaculate Conception

Today we have “beached” ourselves in a decadent exuberance that will leave us depleted, hedging the volatility against currencies that keep proliferating into more degraded forms. The truth is that the higher the priority the further it projects into the future and bigger the pressure it can generate, which needs to be curved. When the ambiguity is so extreme we can cause the chain reaction, when the demand is that high and we have to call on such distant memory we can generate the enrichment and undermine everything. So where is the truth between the bigger deficit and the instinct to suppress, the need life creates to satisfy its own reaction. If we fall victims to our own feelings, we can undo everything really quick, if we are not wise. It is more the cause than the inevitable effect, advancing without purpose, quicksand.

We cannot do the apocalyptic vetting and appeal to a common humanity, claim the immaculate equivalency and become a “citizen of the world”, become hypersensitive and blur the lines, come over the top in big numbers over and over again to drag in the undertow, selling with the left and grinding with the right with every executive order and misguided law lowering the standard. This is part of a vicious cycle of consumption and deception, immaculate rights, immaculate migrations, immaculate integration, police reforms, immigration reforms, marriage reform, what a way to flip the script. But then again, we live in a country of perfect houses and perfect internet, spectacular movies and immaculate monsters, neutral highways, and unadulterated corruption.

 

I don’t believe in the inevitable destiny either because these conflicts are the result of the same doctrines that produce the conflicts and the pressure situations that must then prove themselves. Because it’s the desperate reaching out to God America, reaching out for redemption and the reforms that tell me everything is wrong with my environment to bankrupt it, that’s way I don’t believe in those reforms either. Where is the truth when so many memories are erased, when your Italian restaurant and Irish Pub disappear, when the American Grill is no longer, when Johnny Rockets turns into Chipotle and Rock and Roll into Reggaetón? What burden should each generation bare for the transient condition that becomes even more precarious when whole cultures are uprooted and millions of people displaced, a replacement of the environment that carries the prohibitive price.

 

Liberals have used the desperate and oppressed like a trojan horse to alter the balance of power at any cost, and Hollywood with the immaculate images that usually don’t reflect any reality out there, rather a dangerous paradox that cannot be supported by the environment. Even with the best intention it can be dangerous if we don’t understand what needs to be done and the consequences of selling the transcultural integration to millions of people over millions of square miles and different cultures. If we don’t understand that too much is lost in the undisclosed reality and lack of historical context. If we don’t understand that it impugns people’s condition of existence and promotes the unrest and disconcert, and end up preaching about fantasies hoping not to get caught in the “generic lie”, with the implicit results of subverting the truth to that degree. The commoditized moment doesn’t have to be true or false, it just has to be an emotionally loaded image with the explosive potential.

 

The minority minimization has an internal logic problem which means we must dig deeper for the truth. For one it creates a new minority, so we have to address the resource and find the moral articulations so people can incorporate fully into society. When we simply attribute the problems to white privilege in order to claim an inherent right to the land and the resources we can also ignore essential socioeconomic relationships and become minimalistic, rights to things like free education, healthcare, social security, and other concurring benefits. It actually says forget the last two of three hundred years, that my family does not own any properties, or has money in the stock market, that my uncle could not leave me an inheritance and my parents cannot send me to college because they live in Tegucigalpa or Mexico City, that is part of the reality too. Working in low paying jobs at forty is probably the result of migrating at thirty-nine, and not necessarily the result of racism although it can feed into the stereotypes. The problems in general could be the result of hundreds of years of abuse and neglect but not the immediate conflicts the want to attribute them to, which are probably the result of the environment and the liberal policies. In this scenario the legacy indispensable to human beings becomes expendable. It is what they need it to be because they cannot afford to wait another hundred years for the right development. At the end of the day the melting pot takes time and society can only withstand so much of anything. At some point we fall into the decadent spiral and continue to contribute to the addiction.

 

Democrats expect people from very different cultures to become entrepreneurs and capitalist overnight, people that don’t know the system, don’t know the language, don’t know about finances or accountants, permits and licenses, taxes, retirement strategies, pension funds, 401 k, investment loans and credit scores. People that might not have a qualification or skills to depend on, or ever had a bank account. In the worst-case scenario people used to a life of crime in the kind of numbers society cannot absorb. And then when reality hits blame it on bigotry and racism and demand the benefits, social program and reforms, maybe even universal health care.

 

           Matrimony

 

They don’t believe in borders either because they are arbitrary constructs of white colonialism and imperialist wars, and have watered down the concept of marriage simply because they believe it to be historically a tool of oppression. So much that in a recent poll most college students could not define its function in society or find any traditional marriage. Matrimony comes for the Greek “matri”, which means mother, and “monium” which means “quality of”, in other words “capacity to be a mother”. Marriage is a moral prerogative that looks to allocate resources to the new family as part of our social evolution. Promote procreation and perpetuate the species in the context of a long learning curve reflected in the many years of commitment that takes for a human being to become a mature adult. From the beginnings of time procreation was implicit to marriage which was also linked to other social functions and relationships, even matters of state. It had been the same throughout history until in runs into the political correctness of the apocalyptic left, whose madness is exposes at the point when they promote the dismembered bodies of late term abortions fetuses and the fatherless and motherless children produce in laboratories from sperm donors.

 

The Supreme Court should have sent the debate about same sex marriage back to the legislative branch rather than become so obviously deceptive in the distortion of the constitution and some notion of civil rights. The intent of the institution of marriage was clear and in line with a universal understanding reflected in millinery traditions. The appeals court was simple parsing words in the tradition of the political activism, everybody knows the meaning of the word marriage in every document every written in human history without further distinction. They simply redefined an ancient concept with very a strong evolutionary foundation and cultural roots in a second, an intuitive appreciation of the long bond pair and the traditional family as the nucleus of human society. It has had the same meaning in every civilization form the jungles of the Amazon to the Alps and Asia since the beginning of time.

 

For man equality could only be achieved through moral discretion and segregation of information rather than people. It placed the burden on the culture and set the clock to the group. It validated the spaces and a very flexible environment but generated the need for the legacies and traditions, which exist because of the freedoms not in spite them, because we eliminated selective breeding and other phenomena becomes pervasive if we don’t promote certain things. Marriage has become a refuge from the everyday demand of a very harsh environment, a form of insurance or tool to solve problem associated with the justice and legal system, which is reflective of a more endemic problem, and last but not least the cultural war.

 

A gradual approach would’ve been a wiser for such drastic diversion from convention. In my opinion it called for civil unions and maybe other legal protections but marriage has a different function that should not have been watered down. Matrimony is an ancient institution with existential implication which idea was to allocate resources to the new family and process of procreation, one of the most important predispositions that ever found its social reflection. There is a real danger in disassociating it further from the complex process of multiplication in humans. It is there to disambiguate the very dynamics that produce homosexuality and other phenomena, becoming itself a self-preservation mechanism. Everything marriage avoids has to do with the development of virtue in the context of reproductive equality, which includes age distinctions, polygamy and incest which is a big problem for humans; it exists because of them.

 

It is a man and a woman for the same reason that the gender population remains stable around fifty percent. You can’t have one or the other, the sexual ambiguity goes with the numbers. Human societies recognized a long time ago its sociological and economic implications; health, productivity and otherwise. It’s not just a labor of love or about economics and other issues, it’s all of it. Matrimony vets the liabilities of time and comprises a potential associated with the division of labor in human evolution.