Immaculate Conception

Today we have “beached” ourselves in a decadent exuberance that will leave us depleted, hedging the volatility against currencies that keep proliferating into more degraded forms. The truth is that the higher the priority the further it projects into the future and bigger the pressure it can generate, which needs to be curbed. When the ambiguity is so extreme we can cause the chain reaction, when the demand is that high and we have to call on such distant memory we can undermine everything. So where is the truth between the bigger deficit and the instinct to suppress, the need life creates to satisfy its own reaction. If we fall victims to our own feelings, we can undo everything really quick, if we are not wise. It is more the cause than the inevitable effect, advancing without purpose, quicksand.

We cannot appeal to a common humanity to do the apocalyptic vetting, claim the immaculate equivalency to become a “citizen of the world”, become hypersensitive and blur the lines. Come over the top in big numbers and undermine every law and every custom, over, and over again. Selling with the left and grinding with the right with every executive order and misguided law lowering the standard. This is part of a vicious cycle of consumption and deception, immaculate rights, immaculate migrations, immaculate integration, police reforms, immigration reforms, marriage reform, what a way to flip the script. But then again, we live in a country of perfect houses and perfect internet, spectacular movies and immaculate monsters, neutral highways, and unadulterated corruption.

 

I don’t believe in the inevitable destiny either because these conflicts are the result of the same religious doctrines that produce the friction and the pressure situations that must then prove themselves. Because it’s the desperate reaching out to God America, reaching out for redemption and the reforms that tell me everything is wrong with my environment to bankrupt it, that’s way I don’t believe in those reforms either. Where is the truth when so many memories are erased, when your Italian restaurant and Irish Pub disappear, when the Flamenco Tablao and the American Grill are no longer, when Johnny Rockets turns into Chipotle and Rock and Roll into Hip Hop? What burden should each generation bare for the transient condition that becomes even more precarious when whole cultures are uprooted and millions of people displaced, a replacement of the environment that carries the prohibitive price.

 

Liberals have used the desperate and oppressed like a trojan horse to alter the balance of power at any cost, and Hollywood with the immaculate images that usually don’t reflect any reality out there, rather a dangerous paradox that cannot be supported by the environment. Even with the best intention it can be dangerous if we don’t understand what needs to be done and the consequences of selling the transcultural integration to millions of people over millions of square miles and cultures. If we don’t understand that too much is lost in the undisclosed reality and lack of historical context. If we don’t understand that it impugns people’s condition of existence and promotes the unrest and disconcert, and end up preaching about fantasies hoping not to get caught in the “generic lie”, with the implicit results of subverting the truth to that degree. The commoditized moment doesn’t not have to be true or false, it just has to be an emotionally loaded image with the explosive potential.

 

The minority minimization has an internal logic problem which means we must dig deeper for the truth. For one it creates a new minority, so we have to address the resource and find the moral articulations so people can incorporate fully to society. When we simply attribute things to white privilege to claim an inherent right to the land and the resources we can also ignore essential relationships and become minimalist, things like education, health care, social security and other concurring benefits. It actually says ignore the last two of three hundred years or that my family does not own a ranch or has money in the stock market. That my uncle could not leave me an inheritance and my parents cannot send me to college, because they live in Tegucigalpa. Working in low paying jobs at forty is probably the result of migrating at thirty-nine, and not necessarily the result of racism although it can feed the stereotypes and promote the prejudices. In this scenario the legacy indispensable to human beings becomes expendable. These problems are likely the result of hundreds of years of abuse and neglect but the immediate cause is not what we say it is, but what we need it to be because we can’t afford to wait one hundred years. At the end of the day the melting pot takes time and society can only withstand so much of anything, and that’s the predicament of enrichment. At some point we fall in the decadent spiral and continue to contribute to the addiction.

 

Democrats expect people from very different cultures to become entrepreneurs and capitalist overnight, people that don’t know the system, don’t know the language, don’t know about financing or accountants, permits and licenses, taxes, retirement strategies, pension funds, 401 ks, investment loans and credit scores. People that might not have a qualification or skills to depend on, or even owned a bank account. In the worst-case scenario people used to a life of crime in the kind of numbers society cannot absorb? And then when reality hits blame it on bigotry and racism and demand the benefits, social program and reforms, maybe even universal health care.

 

           Matrimony

 

They don’t believe in borders both because they are arbitrary constructs of white colonialism and imperialist wars, and have watered down the concept of marriage simply because they believe it to be historically a tool of oppression. So much that in a recent poll most college students could not define its function in society or find any traditional marriage. Matrimony comes for the Greek matri, which means mother, and monium which means “quality of”, in other words “capacity to be a mother”. Marriage is a moral prerogative that looks to allocate resources to the new family as part of our social evolution. Promote procreation and perpetuate the species in the context of a long learning curve reflected in the many years of commitment that takes for a human being to become a mature adult. From the beginnings of time procreation was implicit to marriage which was also linked to other social functions and relationships, even matters of state. It had been the same throughout history until in runs into the political correctness of the apocalyptic left, whose madness is exposes at the point when they promote the dismembered bodies of late term abortions fetuses and the fatherless and motherless children produce in laboratories from sperm donors.

 

The Supreme Court should have sent the debate about same sex marriage back to the legislative branch rather than become so obviously deceptive in the distortion of the constitution and some notion of civil rights. The intent of the institution of marriage was clear and in line with a universal understanding reflected in millinery traditions. The appeals court was simple parsing words in the tradition of the political activism, everybody knows the meaning of the word marriage in every document every written in human history without further distinction. They simply redefined an ancient concept with very a strong evolutionary foundation and cultural roots in a second, an intuitive appreciation of the long bond pair and the traditional family as the nucleus of human society. It has had the same meaning in every civilization form the jungles of the Amazon to the Alps and Asia since the beginning of time.

 

For man equality could only be achieved through moral discretion and segregation of information rather than people. It placed the burden on the culture and set the clock to the group. It validated the spaces and a very flexible environment but generated the need for the legacies and traditions, which exist because of the freedoms not in spite them, because we eliminated selective breeding and other phenomena becomes pervasive if we don’t promote certain things. Marriage has become a refuge from the everyday demand of a very harsh environment, a form of insurance or tool to solve problem associated with the justice and legal system, which is reflective of a more endemic problem, and last but not least the cultural war.

 

A gradual approach would’ve been a wiser for such drastic diversion from convention. In my opinion it called for civil unions and maybe other legal protections but marriage has a different function that should not have been watered down. Matrimony is an ancient institution with existential implication which idea was to allocate resources to the new family and process of procreation, one of the most important predispositions that ever found its social reflection. There is a real danger in disassociating it further from the complex process of multiplication in humans. It is there to disambiguate the very dynamics that produce homosexuality and other phenomena, becoming itself a self-preservation mechanism. Everything marriage avoids has to do with the development of virtue in the context of reproductive equality, which includes age distinctions, polygamy and incest which is a big problem for humans; it exists because of them.

 

It is a man and a woman for the same reason that the gender population remains stable around fifty percent. You can’t have one or the other the sexual ambiguity goes with the numbers. Human societies recognized a long time ago its sociological and economic implications; health, productivity and otherwise. It’s not just a labor of love or about economics and other issues, it’s all of it. Matrimony vets the liabilities of time and comprises a potential associated with the division of labor in human evolution.